Misleading Fossil Fuel Ads Are OK; If The Price Is Right ;o)

In Clean Facts, Clean Truth, Health, News, Opinions

In its latest earnings announcement, Facebook reported more than US$15 billion in total revenue between January and the end of April 2019. Of this sum, US$14.9 billion was accrued via advertising, with mobile ads making up 93% of this.

The breakout tool for generating revenue has been the advent of the Stories feature across all their services namely Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, or Messenger which is being used by more than 2.1 billion people daily.

All four channels now each host over 500 million daily active Stories users, according to CNBC. And three million advertisers are using Stories to advertise across all four mediums.

Fossil fuels companies like

  • ExxonMobil spent over US$5 million to advertise on Facebook between May 2018 and July 2019
  • While BP and its subsidiaries spent less than US$300,000
  • Chevron spent roughly US$14,000 on supporting advertisements for “Vote James Ramos AD 40,” a state assembly member from California. 
  • Similarly, BP America helped fund parallel political interests to the tune of over US$600,000
  • ConocoPhillips also makes the list with a combined ad spend of over US$350,000 on Facebook.

The fact that Facebook continues to profit from fossil fuel companies is concerning because the message being broadcasted on the part of these companies is often corrupt or misleading.

ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron, BP and Total had invested over $1Bn in the three years following the Paris Agreement on misleading climate-related branding and lobbying.

Not only does this run in direct contrast with Facebook’s sustainability campaign, but it is also problematic when analyzed from a public health perspective.

Zuckerberg’s company already bans tobacco, firearms, and drugs advertising due to the associated risks.

But if one considers the imminent health risks related to climate change, plus the clear evidence that the top fossil fuel companies are responsible for this warming, shouldn’t that also be grounds for banning fossil fuel?

It seems that if the price is right, the Internet company has no issue backtracking on its green initiatives and advertising policies.

Reference- The Guardian, CNBC, Facebooks Ad Library Report, InfluenceMap website, Clean Technica

Join Our Newsletter!

Love Clean Future? We love to tell you about our new stuff. Subscribe to newsletter!

Mobile Sliding Menu

Clean Future